I just wanted to draw your attention to this post on David Apatoff's blog: Revenge of the Titanic.
He raises some interesting questions about the significance of technology in art, and seems to suggest that digital art technology will fundamentally change the nature of art itself.
I tend to believe that human-ness is what makes art art. Technology may enrich and enable, but not change the nature of art.
What do you think?
SCIENCE: More Things Suck Than Not
4 days ago